Baroness Deech Portrait

Baroness Deech

Crossbench - Life peer

Became Member: 5th October 2005


1 APPG membership (as of 12 Feb 2025)
Get Refusal
2 Former APPG memberships
Holocaust Memorial, Women and Work
Services Committee
28th Jan 2021 - 31st Jan 2024
EU Justice Sub-Committee
2nd Jul 2019 - 23rd Apr 2020
Equality Act 2010 and Disability Committee
11th Jun 2015 - 15th Mar 2016
Communications and Digital Committee
22nd Jun 2010 - 30th Mar 2015
Merits of Statutory Instruments Committee
23rd Nov 2006 - 8th Apr 2010
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee
23rd Nov 2006 - 8th Apr 2010
Draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill (Joint Committee)
9th May 2007 - 8th Aug 2007


Division Voting information

During the current Parliament, Baroness Deech has voted in 6 divisions, and never against the majority of their Party.
View All Baroness Deech Division Votes

Debates during the 2024 Parliament

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal
(4 debate interactions)
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)
(3 debate interactions)
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)
(2 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Leader of the House
(3 debate contributions)
Department for Transport
(2 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
Holocaust Memorial Bill 2022-23
(2,518 words contributed)
View All Legislation Debates
View all Baroness Deech's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Baroness Deech, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


6 Bills introduced by Baroness Deech


A bill to amend the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and make provision in connection with financial settlements following divorce.

Lords Completed

Last Event - 3rd Reading: House Of Lords
Wednesday 18th March 2015

A Bill to amend the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973; and make provision in connection with financial settlements following divorce.

Lords - 40%

Last Event - 2nd Reading : House Of Lords
Friday 27th January 2017
(Read Debate)

A Bill to amend the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and make provision in connection with financial settlements following divorce

Lords - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading
Monday 19th July 2021
(Read Debate)

A bill to provide for a review by the Secretary of State of the regulations governing gamete storage periods

Lords - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading
Wednesday 22nd January 2020
(Read Debate)

A Bill to amend the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and make provision in connection with financial settlements following divorce.

Lords - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Lords
Thursday 4th June 2015

First reading took place on 25 February. This stage is a formality that signals the start of the Bill's journey through the Lords.Second reading - the general debate on all aspects of the Bill - is yet to be scheduled.The 2013-14 session of parliament has prorogued and this Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to amend the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and to make provision in connection with financial settlements following divorce.

Lords - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Lords
Tuesday 25th February 2014

Baroness Deech has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 19 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
9th Oct 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of Network Rail’s management of the replacement of the bridge at Oxford station, with reference to its effects on local residents, disabled people and businesses; and when they expect the work to be completed.

Network Rail and Great Western Railway are executing plans to mitigate the impacts of the closure of Botley Road on station users, the wider public and businesses during the current closure of Botley Road. Work is underway to provide additional support for persons with reduced mobility as well as improvements to wayfinding, lighting and access to the station. Network Rail is working with Thames Water to produce a plan to complete critical utility works and to re-open the road. I have promised to meet stakeholders with Andrew Haines, the Chief Executive of Network Rail, as soon as there is a robust plan in place to complete the works. In the meantime, we welcome all further ideas on the most effective ways of mitigating the effects of the delays on local people, businesses and railway passengers, as we understand and regret the delays in delivering the works and the effect this is having.

Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
Minister of State (Department for Transport)
2nd Sep 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the economic and social cost to Oxford of the closure of the A420 into the city; and what steps they plan to take, if any, to ensure that Network Rail is held accountable for the impact of the long-term closure of the road.

Network Rail has not undertaken an assessment of the impacts and social costs resulting from the continuing closure of the A420 (Botley Road) to deliver the Oxford station improvements. Network Rail is working to produce a plan to complete the works and re-open the road. When this has been finalised I propose to meet with stakeholders to discuss it. I wrote to you on 2 September and explained that Network Rail and Great Western Railway are executing a plan to mitigate the impacts of the road closure on those accessing the station and city centre, including persons with restricted mobility. I expect Network Rail to continue to promote Oxford as being open for business throughout this critical and challenging phase.

Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
Minister of State (Department for Transport)
2nd Sep 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the performance of Network Rail in replacing the Oxford railway bridge which has involved closing the main road (A420) into the city centre for the past 16 months and postponing the reopening indefinitely.

Network Rail has not undertaken an assessment of the impacts and social costs resulting from the continuing closure of the A420 (Botley Road) to deliver the Oxford station improvements. Network Rail is working to produce a plan to complete the works and re-open the road. When this has been finalised I propose to meet with stakeholders to discuss it. I wrote to you on 2 September and explained that Network Rail and Great Western Railway are executing a plan to mitigate the impacts of the road closure on those accessing the station and city centre, including persons with restricted mobility. I expect Network Rail to continue to promote Oxford as being open for business throughout this critical and challenging phase.

Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
Minister of State (Department for Transport)
2nd Sep 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with Network Rail concerning the impact on (1) local businesses, (2) older people, (3) disabled people, and (4) pregnant people, of the extended closure of Botley Road as part of the redevelopment of Oxford's rail station; and whether they intend to make resources available to Network Rail to mitigate that impact.

I wrote to you on 2 September and explained that Network Rail and Great Western Railway are executing a plan to mitigate the impacts of the closure of Botley Road on station users, the wider public and businesses during the current closure of Botley Road. Work is under way to provide additional support for persons with reduced mobility as well as improvements to wayfinding, lighting and access to the station. Network Rail is working to produce a plan to complete the works and re-open the road. When this has been finalised I propose to meet with stakeholders to discuss it.

Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
Minister of State (Department for Transport)
21st Oct 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to reconsider their funding of UNRWA, in the light of reports that (1) Ismail Haniyeh, and a bodyguard of Yahyah Sinwar, were both former UNRWA teachers; and (2) UNRWA staff have stolen food intended for Gazans.

We were appalled by the allegations that those involved in the 7 October attacks against Israel may have included United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) staff. The Secretary-General and the Commissioner General of UNRWA took these allegations seriously and acted decisively. We expect robust processes to continue to be followed. UNRWA must meet the highest standards of neutrality as laid out in Catherine Colonna's report, including staff vetting and acting swiftly when concerns arise. The UK has allocated £1 million to support UNRWA to implement the report's recommendations. The FCDO will continue its own annual assessment of UK funding to UNRWA, which plays a vital role in saving lives in Gaza. We separately note that UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini confirmed on 17 October that allegations a staff member died alongside former Hamas leader Yahyah Sinwar were unfounded. We have not received reports of UNRWA staff stealing food, nor are we aware of allegations regarding Ismail Haniyeh being reported to UNWRA.

Lord Collins of Highbury
Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
16th Oct 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the continuing inability of Chagossians to return to Diego Garcia and the compliance with international human rights law of their current situation.

As a result of the agreement reached on 3 October, we intend that Chagossians will be able to access the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia, under a new programme of visits to be established by the UK and Mauritius as soon as possible. This was a priority for the UK in negotiations. Mauritius has additionally confirmed its intention to launch a programme of resettlement for the Archipelago. This will not include Diego Garcia, reflecting its status as an active military base with no permanent population.

Baroness Chapman of Darlington
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)
7th Oct 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of any inconsistency between the diplomatic pronouncements of (1) the Consul General in Jerusalem, and (2) the British embassy in Israel; and what plans they have, if any, to ensure such statements are consistent.

The British Embassy in Tel Aviv and British Consulate General in Jerusalem work closely together as part of one diplomatic network to press for an immediate ceasefire and a resolution to the conflict. We do not agree that there have been any inconsistencies between public statements by either mission, both of which represent the policies of the UK Government. We condemn personal attacks on individual members of our diplomatic staff, and reject attempts to portray differences in position which do not exist. An immediate ceasefire is the first step towards a lasting solution. Both the Embassy and Consulate General remain open and continue to work as normal, including providing services to British nationals.

Lord Collins of Highbury
Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
7th Oct 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what information is held by the Consul General in Jerusalem on reported Hamas involvement in UNRWA.

We have taken a close interest in the allegations of Hamas involvement in United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) and subsequent investigations, on behalf of His Majesty's Government. We welcome UNRWA's decisive action and support their decision to terminate contracts of individuals involved in the October 7 atrocities. Anyone who participated in the horrific October 7 attacks should face the full force of the law.

Lord Collins of Highbury
Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
7th Oct 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government in the light of the Independent Review of Mechanisms and Procedures to Ensure Adherence by UNRWA to the Humanitarian Principle of Neutrality, published for the Secretary-General on 20 April, what assessment they have made of subsequent reports, and videos, of UNRWA's involvement with Hamas and its infrastructure.

We take these reports seriously and are following up with United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) to establish the facts. We expect UNRWA to meet the highest standards of neutrality as laid out in Catherine Colonna's report, including staff vetting. We welcome UNRWA's decisive action and support their decision to terminate the contracts of individuals involved in the October 7 atrocities. Catherine Colonna's review found that UNRWA had policies and procedures in place to ensure the organisation's neutrality. The FCDO speaks regularly to UNRWA and to other international donors on UNRWA management reforms, including at their bi-annual Advisory Commission meeting that met in June.

Lord Collins of Highbury
Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
21st Jan 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities on 22 May 2024 (HC Deb cols 975–6) that £18 million had already been spent on the planned UK Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre, how much they have spent since that date and what the additional spending relates to.

From 1 April 2023 to 22 January 2025 £2.71 million has been spent on project costs, including work on the Holocaust Memorial Bill, preparations for redetermination of the planning application and preparation for the commencement of construction. £1.66 million of that money has been spent since 22 May 2024.

Lord Khan of Burnley
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)
20th Jan 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Khan of Burnley on 20 January (HL3595), whether there has been any further expenditure on the planned UK Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre since the £138.8m estimate of March 2023; and if so, how much has been spent and what does the additional spending relate to.

From 1 April 2023 to 22 January 2025 £2.71 million has been spent on project costs, including work on the Holocaust Memorial Bill, preparations for redetermination of the planning application and preparation for the commencement of construction. £1.66 million of that money has been spent since 22 May 2024.

Lord Khan of Burnley
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)
13th Jan 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what is their definition of "Holocaust" for the purposes of the learning centre planned for Victoria Tower Gardens by the UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation; and to which genocides the learning centre will seek to make reference.

The scope and content of the Learning Centre exhibition will be developed by the UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation, drawing on a wide range of external advice and expertise. Further information can be found on the UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation website page and in their mission statement: UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation - GOV.UK

Lord Khan of Burnley
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)
6th Jan 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Khan of Burnley on 20 December 2024 (HL3595), what is the current estimated cost of building a Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre in Victoria Tower Gardens; how much private funding has been secured for the memorial; and what efficiencies of cost, if any, they are considering.

Estimated costs and the expected charitable donations were set out in the Written statement of 28 June 2023 by Baroness Scott of Bybrook [Statement HLWS875].

Lord Khan of Burnley
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)
18th Dec 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government, following the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s request to departments to identify 5 per cent efficiency savings, what consideration has been given to economies in the cost of constructing a planned underground Holocaust Learning Centre in Victoria Tower Gardens.

The Government is seeking Parliament’s approval of the Holocaust Memorial Bill with a view to constructing the UK national Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre as quickly and efficiently as possible.

Lord Khan of Burnley
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)
9th Oct 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to combating (1) antisemitism, and (2) anti-Zionism, in designing the contents of the planned Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre in Victoria Tower Gardens; and whether they have carried out an impact assessment of (a) that centre, or (b) any other Holocaust museum or memorial.

The Learning Centre will set the Holocaust within a context that includes the history of antisemitism, including the antisemitism experienced by Jewish communities in Britain over many centuries. The scope and content of the Learning Centre exhibition will be developed by the UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation, drawing on a wide range of external advice and expertise.

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
9th Oct 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration has been given to the construction of an emergency exit from the underground Holocaust Learning Centre planned for Victoria Tower Gardens.

Plans for the national Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre include an enclosed emergency escape stair leading to the escape exit at ground level. Escape plans have been approved by independent Building Inspectors at the appropriate stages of design, and reviewed by the London Fire Brigade.

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
18th Dec 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to give consideration to the options for reform set out by the Law Commission in its scoping report Financial remedies on divorce and dissolution (HC 460), published on 17 December.

The Government is grateful to the Law Commission for its work on this important and complex area. We will carefully consider the details and will provide a response in due course.

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede
Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)